Open ENA brings together learning science, quantitative ethnography, artificial intelligence, and educational technology.
We are building a transparent and approachable path into Epistemic Network Analysis—one where methods, interface decisions, and future capabilities can be inspected rather than hidden.
Why open
Openness is more than access.
It means making the path from evidence to interpretation visible: what the model receives, what the computation does, what the figure shows, and what it cannot claim.
Education and research, free forever
Open ENA is a non-commercial platform for educational and research purposes and will remain free forever.
A shared commitment to understandable research tools.
Dr. Peter HU Dongpin
The Education University of Hong Kong
Educational researcher · Application developer
His work spans technology-enhanced learning, learning analytics, artificial intelligence in education, network analysis, and content and language integrated learning.
ENA variants · Dimensionality-reduction algorithms
He has played a pioneering role in advancing ENA variants such as 3D ENA and dimensionality-reduction algorithms for ENA. As the key developer of 3D ENA 1.0, he combines computer science and psychology to develop interactive research tools.
A member of the Open ENA team affiliated with Meredith College, North Carolina, USA.
Project publications
Selected work across three-dimensional ENA, data literacy, and the development of open, web-based analysis tools.
Forthcoming conference paper · 2026
Design and development from rENA to jENA: Accelerating the creation of web-based Open ENA tools
Hu, D., Hamilton, E., Tu, Y. F., & Xu, Q. (2026, November). Design and development from rENA to jENA: Accelerating the creation of web-based Open ENA tools. [Conference paper]. International Conference on Quantitative Ethnography.
ICQE 2026 · Publication details forthcoming
Journal article · 2025
Effects on the learning achievement, approaches to learning, and multi-stage reflection quality of students with different levels of digital self-efficacy in a data literacy course: An ARCS-based self-reflective online learning model
Tu, Y. F., Hwang, G. J., & Hu, D. (2025). Effects on the learning achievement, approaches to learning, and multi-stage reflection quality of students with different levels of digital self-efficacy in a data literacy course: An ARCS-based self-reflective online learning model. Computers & Education, 238, 105397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105397
Development of ENA 3D: A tool for epistemic network analysis in three-dimensional space
Yu, J., Hu, D., & Wang, C. H. (2024). Development of ENA 3D: A tool for epistemic network analysis in three-dimensional space. In Y. J. Kim & Z. Swiecki (Eds.), Advances in quantitative ethnography (Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 2278, pp. 152–165). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76335-9_11
Open ENA builds on the theory and methods of Quantitative Ethnography (QE) and Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA). We gratefully acknowledge the University of Wisconsin–Madison, Professor David Williamson Shaffer, and the researchers, software developers and collaborators of the Epistemic Analytics Lab at the Wisconsin Center for Education Research for their foundational and continuing contributions to QE, ENA and the webENA tool.
QE combines contextual, qualitative understanding of human activity with quantitative analysis. (Shaffer, 2017)
ENA models connections by analyzing the co-occurrence of coded elements in meaningful contexts, supporting both network visualization and statistical comparison. (Shaffer et al., 2016)
Grounded in this research, Open ENA brings coded data, model settings and network comparisons into a browser-based research workflow. Researchers must interpret results in relation to their research questions, coding decisions and original qualitative evidence. (Shaffer & Ruis, 2017)
The webENA origins of our initial interface
The Open ENA team used and referred to the webENA tool when establishing this platform's initial visual appearance and layout. We explicitly acknowledge that this initial interface reference originated with the original ENA research team and its webENA design work in Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
ENA network visualization is also informed by research on visual design and interpretation. (Tan et al., 2022)
Open ENA is an independent platform maintained by the Open ENA team.
Shaffer, D. W., Collier, W., & Ruis, A. R. (2016). A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: Analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 9–45. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.33.3
Shaffer, D. W., & Ruis, A. R. (2017). Epistemic network analysis: A worked example of theory-based learning analytics. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. F. Wise, & D. Gašević (Eds.), Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 175–187). Society for Learning Analytics Research. https://doi.org/10.18608/hla17.015
Tan, Y., Hinojosa, C., Marquart, C., Ruis, A. R., & Shaffer, D. W. (2022). Epistemic network analysis visualization. In B. Wasson & S. Zörgő (Eds.), Advances in quantitative ethnography (pp. 129–143). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93859-8_9